Letter Regarding COVID-19

INTRODUCTION


The Scottish Government responded to an email of mine wherein I had listed the SARS-CoV-2 survival rates, questioning the ongoing vaccination frenzy. Their response can be accessed at the bottom of this page below my answer:


Dear Ciara McCullagh,
Thank you for your reply.
Your information was very helpful since it shows your evasiveness: I had provided CDC survival rates while you provide irrelevant mantras.
A government would scarcely admit that its decision making regarding Covid-19 is guided by willing (or unwilling) ignorance, so why the assurance of being guided by the latest scientific evidence? And why repeating that vaccination is the best way to decrease the risk of mortality without addressing how minimal the latter is? And why should we ever expect medicines to be licensed which would minimize the already minimal mortality rate and thereby thwarting a depopulation project? Is this some kind of kindergarten here?
"It is vital for the current Covid-19 vaccination programme to reach everyone both for individual health and our collective community wellbeing. Choosing to get a vaccine is good for you and your community ... Vaccines remain the best way to protect people from COVID-19 and have already saved thousands of lives."
Trusting that you're not a robot, Ciara, and that you don't just adjust preformulated emails and brew coffee: any government worker who has the chutzpa to send the above without even hinting at the thousands who have died due to vaccination or are suffering from severe adverse affects since their jab, I deem criminal. So far over 4,000 deaths and 50,000 vaccine injuries have been reported in the US, and the EU excels with over 7,000 deaths and 365,000 vaccine injuries.
Isn't that terrible? Or maybe it's good from your point of view? The more die and are sick, the better for our "collective community wellbeing."
I assume the above side effects are justified by the greater good, and that's why rashly approved 'vaccines' which haven't proven to prevent disease are so helpful?
Well, where is the evidence that PCR tests are 100% reliable and not flawed and designed to inflate infection rates? After all, so far everything possible has been done to inflate Covid infection & death rates. And where is the evidence that masks help? (it's not there as per Stanford University).
The above questions are merely rhetorical since I don't intend to play ping-pong all day long. Trouble is who (and WHO) decides what "scientific evidence" is. A few years ago millions of people believed the government, the media, and the approved scientific experts and their evidence. The trust and support of the public sadly resulted in the death of millions. Today we see the same approach on a worldwide scale: "misinformation" and material deemed dangerous for the public is being removed (as back then; it was called the Third Reich).
You do realize that a team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity, don't you? Any complicits will be subject to the laws set forth in the Geneva Convention and Nuremberg Code and can be tried, found guilty and put to death. Legal proceedings are moving forward, evidence has been collected and a large growing body of experts is sounding the alarm.
I hope this information has been of help; feel free to forward to your philanthropic colleagues.
Yours sincerely
J. Wilson